Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eric James Johnson vs Daniel Cukierman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Johnson vs Cukierman analysis and find out who is favored!
Eric James Johnson vs Daniel Cukierman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Johnson 1 - 0 Cukierman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Johnson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cukierman has won 48.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Johnson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cukierman has won 57.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Johnson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cukierman has saved 46.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Johnson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Cukierman winning 59.26% (W/L 32/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Johnson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 59/ 45), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Cukierman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 44/ 30), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Johnson winning 1 times and Cukierman being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Johnson winning 2 and Cukierman winning 0. The last match between Johnson and Cukierman was at the Canada F5, 20-07-2015, First, Hard with Eric James Johnson getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Johnson and Cukierman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Johnson winning 0 times and Cukierman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Johnson winning 0, and Cukierman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Johnson has played against opponents with an average rank of while Cukierman has played against players with an average rank of 239.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Johnson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cukierman has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Johnson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cukierman has converted 45.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
510
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
459
Rank
339
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
56% (64-51)
Career Total W/L
58% (246-181)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
56% (14-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Eric James Johnson vs Daniel Cukierman For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Johnson VS Cukierman
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Eric James Johnson | Daniel Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eric James Johnson | Daniel Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (14/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (34/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (287/249) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (12/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 48 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 98 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 244.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1013/1617) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (675/1013) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (292/604) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (94/206) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (778/1773) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (13/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (14/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 17% (12/2) |
Eric James Johnson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Eric James Johnson
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Tursunov
Player
Eric James Johnson
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
74
Total Points Won
73
|
0-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Eric James Johnson
Player
Jenson Brooksby
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
87%
(
55 of
63)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eric James Johnson
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
56%
(
60 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduardo Dischinger
Player
Eric James Johnson
52%
(
60 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
63 of
111)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hunter Callahan
Player
Eric James Johnson
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Eric James Johnson
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eric James Johnson
Player
Evan Zhu
53%
(
62 of
118)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
0
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
7
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
48%
(
27 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
8 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
56 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
105
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric James Johnson
Player
Gabriel Friedrich
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manuel Sanchez
Player
Eric James Johnson
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
5
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Daniel Cukierman
70%
(
73 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
104)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
34%
(
36 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Daniel Cukierman
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Richard Zusman
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
10
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Ignacio Carou
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Johnson Vs Cukierman Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Johnson are available here and Cukierman photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
